Don’t abuse language features

Recently we had a situation in a ES6 project. We were using some of new features ES6 in a wrong way. I’m writing this blog post to explain what was the issue and what is the solution to avoid these kind of problems it the future.

ES6 Promise

We designed a Message box class which accepts a title, text and buttons. Then, you can call open to display the message box. User can decide to click on Yes or No button (assume there is a Accept / Reject button on the message box).

That open function returns a Promise which fulfills the Promise if user clicked on Yes and rejects it if you click on No button. Therefore you can decide what to do with the Promise.

This is sample of that API:

let msg = Message({ 
	text: "Hello world", 
	title: "Are you sure?",
}).open(); //msg is a Promise now 


Now, to test and see if user clicked on Accept or Reject button, you can use then() or catch() of Promise object. But we didn’t use these functions. Instead, we use try...catch with async / await keywords.

Incorrect usage of Promise

Another way to handle Promise is to use async and await keywords, like so:


(async function () {
	try {
  	let res = await ReturnPromise();
    console.log("gotcha", res);
  } catch (e) {


It would reach the catch block if user clicked on Reject and the try block if Accept (actually, it would execute anything after await keyword, otherwise, it throws an exception and hits the catch block).

Well, above usage is correct, too, but there are many problem with that approach:

1) Suppressing errors

If you add anything to that try block, you would need to handle the errors on the catch block. If you don’t handle them in try catch block, it would suppress the errors and wouldn’t be able to understand what is going on in your application in case of any errors.

2) Catch block

You cannot remove the catch block. You should either leave it empty or add something between the catch block. Imagine your application with a milion of empty catch blocks:

(async function () {
	try {
  	let res = await ReturnPromise();
    console.log("gotcha", res);
  } catch (e) { } // <-- this is the empty block


Also, sometimes you just need to handle the Accept case and there is no need to handle the catch or Reject case. Now, you can’t do anything but adding an empty catch block.

3) You are not handling an error!

You should use try catch when you want to handle an error and do something instead of letting the application to crash and exit the main. Is that case, we were not handling an error. Clicking on a Reject button is not an error.


Write maintainable code

Remember, you are writing codes and it should be readable and understandable for other contributors and if you use some sort of weird syntax in your program, it doesn’t prove anything about the level of your coding skills or how talented you are. A good code is boring to read.

Character density using Haskell

In this short tutorial, I’m going to write a simple Haskell program to calculate the density of characters in a given text. For instance, in “hello” we have [('e',0.2),('h',0.2),('l',0.4),('o',0.2)].

The return format of our application would be a list of tuples

String -> [(Char, Float)]

To make the problem easier to solve, I’m going to break it into two programs. One that returns the number of repeats for each character and another program that converts that list to a percentage of repeats.

Count of repeats

freq_letter :: String -> [(Char, Int)]
freq_letter str = [ (x,c) | x <- ['a'..'z'], let c = (length.filter (==x)) str, c>0 ]

This program returns a list of tuples with the Char and Int. First item of tuple is the character in the given text and the second parameter, Int, is the count of repeats in the text. Executing this program will return:

*Main> freq_letter "hello"

Percentage of repeats

freq_letter_pc :: String -> [(Char, Float)]
freq_letter_pc str = [ (char, fromIntegral(count) / fromIntegral(length str)) | x <- freq_letter (map toLower str), let (char,count) = x]

Second part of the application uses the previous program to get the list of repeats and then divide them by the length of the given text. This way we can calculate the density of characters in the text. Executing this program returns:

*Main> freq_letter_pc "hello"

That's it.


In this tutorial, we have learnt how to calculate the density of characters using Haskell. Achieving this goal is much easier in Haskell because of list comprehension and higher order functions.

Optimized solution to calculate first powers of 2

I experienced many programming contests and olympiads but this one was really different. In a programming contest on Hacker Rank, I faced with a challenging problem and it was the main reason I failed the test. That question made me nervous and stressful so I gave up. When I found the solution after the test, I laughed so loud.

The question is:

Calculate sum of first powers of 2 without using any built-in language API to calculate the power. Implement optimized solution.

Well, there are two factors. First, not using built-in functions like Math.pow and second implementing the optimized solution. So, of course a recursive function or for-loop is not the answer.


Use bitwise operations. How? Ok, let me show you a trick.

parseInt(10, '2')    == Math.pow(2, 1); //2^1 = 2
parseInt(100, '2')   == Math.pow(2, 2); //2^2 = 4
parseInt(1000, '2')  == Math.pow(2, 3); //2^3 = 8
parseInt(10000, '2') == Math.pow(2, 4); //2^4 = 16
//and so on

So, how to make 10, 100 or 1000? Using shift operations you can make it:

1 << 1 //2
1 << 2 //4
1 << 3 //8
1 << 4 //16

A short explanation of above source code is that the binary of 1 is 00000001 and when you use left shift operator, the result is 00000010, 00000100 and so on.

So the answer is to use a for-loop for N:

var sum = 0;
for (var i = 1;i <= n;i++) {
  sum += 1 << i;

 Can we make it better?

Yes. Here is the final hack.

The sum of first N powers of 2 is 2^(N + 1) - 2. For instance, n = 3:

(2 ^ (3 + 1)) - 2 = 16 - 2 = 2 + 4 + 8 = 14

And then, using bitwise operations we have:

console.log((2 << n) - 2);

Please note that the binary of 2 is 00000010.

Actually, this is the right answer.

Edit: You can find more interesting examples here:

Source: New feed

Using `object` as the keys of another `object` in JavaScript

Sometimes you need to use objects for the keys of a dictionary (let’s say, another object).

Assume this code:

var keys = [{a: 1}, {a: 2}, {a: 3}];
var dic = {};

//add a new key to the dictionary
dic[keys[0]] = 'boo';
dic[keys[1]] = 'foo';

Above code yields this result:

console.log(dic); //Object {[object Object]: "foo"}

So the dictionary doesn’t have two items because object keys cannot be object. You can get the item with [object Object] string:

console.log(dic['[object Object]']); //returns `foo`

Ok, wait. Then how we can set objects as the keys of a dictionary?

 ECMAScript 6 – Map

Map feature in ES6 enables you to assign objects as the keys of a dictionary (or another object).

Here is the ES6 compatible of the previous example:

var keys = [{a: 1}, {a: 2}, {a: 3}];
var map = new Map();

//add a new key to the dictionary
map.set(keys[0], 'boo');
map.set(keys[1], 'foo');

And the map variable should be:

Map {Object {a: 1} => "boo", Object {a: 2} => "foo"}

Besides, you can get the item with get:

map.get(keys[0]); //returns `boo`

Or set a new value for one of items:

map.set([keys[0], 'new value');

Here you can read more about Map feature in ECMAScript 6:

Source: New feed

Block scope variable – ECMAScript 6

Since some of ECMAScript 6 features looks weird to old-fashioned JavaScripters, I’m going to write a series of blog posts to describe the main idea of some common ECMAScript 6 features.

In this posts I’d like to explain the usage of block scope variables. The keyword let enables you to create a block scope variable in ECMAScript 6:

let boo = 1;

So, what’s the difference between var boo = 1; and let boo = 1;? Assume following example:

function sample() {
  if (true) {
    var boo = 1;
  return boo;

console.log(sample()); //returns 1

In the above old-fashioned code, boo variable is defined within the sample function scope so we have the value even outside of the if statement.

With let variable you can create a variable that is available within the if statement block:

function sample() {
  if (true) {
    let boo = 1;
  return boo; //ReferenceError: boo is not defined


Awesome, isn’t it?

I will write more blog posts about ECMAScript 6 features soon.

Source: New feed

Source: New feed

Python: List and Tuple performance benchmark

Suppose you have two options to implement a solution using a programming language, what are important factors to select one of options? I do believe one of concerns for a programmer would be performance benchmark between those options.

In this short blog post I’d like to share my simple code and results for performance benchmark between Python list and tuple. Two features to create a list, but with this difference, that tuples are immutable and you can’t alter them after initializing.

Following code shows a simple usage of list and tuple to create a series of items:

# this is a list, you can alter it in next lines
l = [1, 2, 3, 4, 5]

# this is a tuple and it's immutable
t = (1, 2, 3, 4, 5) 

Please note that you can store different data types as an item for both tuple and list.

My scenario to make a performance benchmark between list and tuple is retrieving 2,000,000 random items from a list (or tuple) with 1,000,000 items.

Here is the source code for list:

import time
from random import randint

x = 1000000

demo_list = []

# add items to list
while x > 0:
    x = x - 1

start = time.clock()

# find random items from list
y = 2000000
while y > 0:
    item = demo_list[randint(0, 999999)]
    y = y - 1

# print the elapsed time
print (time.clock() - start)

Following chart illustrates the performance benchmark between list and tuple on a Mac OS X 10.9.3 and Python 2.7.5:

Benchmark between list and tuple

Elapsed times:

  • Tuple: 5.1217s
  • List: 5.2462s

And it seems tuples are a little bit faster in retrieving items.

You can download the source code for both list and tuple from my Github account:

Source: New feed

Using Redis as session store for ExpressJS + PassportJS settings

Since all other articles about using Redis as a session store for ExpressJS are out of date due to latest update of connect-redis, I’m going to write this short article to show how to use Redis as session store for ExpressJS.

In order to use Redis as session store for ExpressJS, first of all install connect-redis package using npm:

npm install connect-redis

Then, add connect-redis to your dependencies and Following code shows the content of app.js file:

var express = require('express');
var RedisStore = require('connect-redis')(express.session);

app.use(express.session({ store: new RedisStore({
  host: '',
  port: 6379
}), secret: 'hey you' }));

If you’re using PassportJS for users authentication, you can simply add two following lines to your app.js file to enable PassportJS as well:


That’s it. Now you have PassportJS for authentication and Redis as session store for ExpressJS.

Furthermore you can use following code to delete the Redis session:

exports.logout = function (req, res) {

Source: New feed

Why C# is not a good choice for web development?

C# is the main programming language in Iran. I’ve worked with several teams, various projects and developers with different development skills. Earlier I’ve worked with PHP.

There weren’t any motivations to migrate from PHP to C# but the company’s infrastructure. Most of web development companies in Iran work with C# and Microsoft technologies, and here is the reason, because they don’t want to learn more. Companies prefer to stay at the same level and do not pay for improving their developers skills!

If you ask them: “Why you are using C# for web development?” I bet they won’t give you acceptable answer.

I haven’t used C# for my own projects, and I won’t at all. It’s preferable to me to use NodeJS or Python, not only because of their popularity, but because they are scripting languages.

After spending ages with C#-based web apps I want to tell something horrible about this language and why it’s not an appropriate choice for web development.

What I explain here is the issue that I faced with, several times. Before explaining the problem let me tell you something about C# compiler and how it works.

Suppose you have a Service Layer project, like following:

  • UserService.cs
  • GroupService.cs
  • NewsService.cs

All of above files are located in a same project (.csproj file). You can use this project as a dependency for other projects, for instance, the NewsService class to fetch news from database. If you compile it, compiler gives a .dll file. This file is used as a dependency file for other projects, meaning, in order to change only one method in NewsService class, you should replace whole dll file, not only one file.

And yes, I know, it’s not the problem of C#.

Ok, here is the difficulty. We have a C#-based web app in our company, we use MVC for it’s presentation. There are a lot of instances of this app that deployed in different machines. Suddenly, we realized that there is a performance issue in our app. One of our customers reported it to us. The remedy was change the logic of a method in the Service Layer.

The change is easy, change the method, build it and replace new dll with old one. But replacing the new dll file will change other class and methods signature and logic, too.

I realized that the current version of deployed application is a little bit older than last stable version. So, if I decided to replace the fixed Service Layer with the current one, application will break because of the change of other methods.

In this situation you can ask me why you don’t have any versioning system, this kind of issues can be solved using Semver or something. My answer is: we were wrong at the first days of structuring our team, so we missed this part.

But what if we used Python instead of C#? The key was as easy as fixing that method and upload only one file, without touching other files. Additionally, changing a C#-based web app version is a nightmare for me. Conflicts between dll files, their versions, etc.

Despite all great features and nice parts of C#, in my opinion above reasons make it a bad choice for web development.

At the end of nagging I want to show you something:


Is it cool to use a design pattern name as a name for framework?

Source: New feed

MongoDB singleton connection in NodeJs

In this post, I want to share a piece of useful source code to make a singleton connection in NodeJs. By using this piece of code, you will have always one connection in your NodeJs application, so it will be more faster. Also, if you are using NodeJs frameworks like ExpressJs, it will be useful too.


var Db = require('mongodb').Db;
var Connection = require('mongodb').Connection;
var Server = require('mongodb').Server;
//the MongoDB connection
var connectionInstance;

module.exports = function(callback) {
  //if already we have a connection, don't connect to database again
  if (connectionInstance) {

  var db = new Db('your-db', new Server("", Connection.DEFAULT_PORT, { auto_reconnect: true }));, databaseConnection) {
    if (error) throw new Error(error);
    connectionInstance = databaseConnection;

And simply you can use it anywhere like this:

var mongoDbConnection = require('./lib/connection.js');

exports.index = function(req, res, next) {
  mongoDbConnection(function(databaseConnection) {
    databaseConnection.collection('collectionName', function(error, collection) {
      collection.find().toArray(function(error, results) {
        //blah blah

Now, you will have only one connection in your NodeJs application.

Download codes from Gist:

Let me know what you think 🙂

Source: New feed